On November 17th, 2009, we are holding a special event, an open forum that has the goal to present both special creation and evolution that coincides with the anniversary of the publication of the Origin of Species. To this end, I sent the following letter to local science professors:
Dear Professors,
I would like to take this chance to personally invite you and your students to a special event celebrating the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species. This event will be held on November 17th at 7:00 PM in the upstairs of the SMSU Student Center, the main lobby area.
This will be an open forum ‘Town Hall’ style discussion. It will focus on the continuing debate between those who believe that an Intelligent designer created not only humankind, but all the creatures of the earth, and the earth itself and those who hold to the theory of Evolution and/or the appearance of the universe from another set of circumstances. I do not know personally what view you as scientists hold to, but we have also invited and confirmed a scientist who holds to a special creation point of view. It should be a vibrant and interesting discussion. In the town hall style forum, there will be no view that is held up as ‘right’, rather, we will have the opportunity to discuss our points of view as well as scientific facts and allow our audience to make up their own minds concerning the topic.
Topics will include, but are not limited to:
* DNA
* macroevolution and microevolution
* old earth vs. young earth
* the Cambrian Explosion
* Social implications of special creation vs. evolution
* Scientific method
* the missing link/transitional formsThis will be a great academic opportunity, with students, professors, doctors, and curious community members who are trying to form an opinion about this discussion, and the implications of it to the way in which they view the world. It is our hope that you will not only come and participate, but that you will encourage your students to do so as well. The first 100 audience participants will receive a FREE special 150th anniversary edition of The Origin of Species. For your participation, we will also provide you with a copy as well.
We hope that you will honor us with your presence, and that you will encourage your students to come and participate.
Sincerely,
John B. Chisham
Campus Leader, CCNSMSU
Today, a letter was published in our local editorial section, in response to the invitation:
To the editor:
Monday, I received an email inviting me to a “celebration” on campus of the 150th anniversary of the publication of Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species”. Reading further through the email, I realized this upcoming event will NOT be a celebration of Darwin’s painstakingly obtained insights into how the biological world works. Rather, it will be a celebration of ignorance cloaked in a veil of dishonesty – a Creationist event sponsored by professional Creationists.
My evidence for this is my history observing Creationists and the publicity email’s advertised gift of a “FREE Anniversary edition of THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES.” From the picture in the email, I see this is not the official Anniversary edition of Darwin’s book, no, this is the Ray Comfort (a professional Creationist) butchered edition of Darwin’s book. The Amazon.com reviews of Comfort’s “work” indicate that these “Celebrations” and free book give-aways are occurring on campuses across the nation.
Apparently, the professional Creationists are hitting the road with their traveling medicine show of ignorance and lies. My experience with these shows is that there is a canned sequence of canards thrown out in quick succession. Here is a summary from Kent Hovind’s (another professional Creationist) “show”: the information in DNA cannot have evolved, therefore Jesus. Microevolution is only change within kinds and macroevolution has never been observed, therefore Jesus. “Belief” in evolution is the root cause of all societal ills, therefore Jesus. There are no transitional fossils, therefore Jesus.
In response to the myriad court cases that have been lost by professional Creationists, telling them repeatedly that they cannot teach their religious beliefs in public schools as “science,” a new tactic has been advocated: pretend they are not talking about God and instead speak of an “intelligent designer.” (Have I mentioned the dishonesty of professional Creationists?) Here is my prediction about what anyone attending the upcoming “Celebration” is likely to hear: the information in DNA cannot have evolved, therefore, Jesus intelligent designer. Microevolution is only change within kinds and macroevolution has never been observed, therefore Jesus intelligent designer. “Belief” in evolution is the root cause of all societal ills, therefore Jesus intelligent designer. There are no transitional fossils, therefore Jesus intelligent designer.
Anyone wishing to attend the “Celebration” feel free to use the above as a checklist. If the professional Creationist also mentions the Big Bang or the impossibility of the origin of life, feel free to yell out “Yahtzee!”
As for me, I will be doing something much more productive with my time; contemplating my navel lint springs to mind.
Note: In the interest of full disclosure, I am submitting this this letter to the SMSU Spur. Also, in response to the inevitable criticism that I am “anti-Christian”, I want to note that I am a volunteer scientific consultant for the Clergy Letter Project (www.butler.edu/clergyproject/rel_evol_sun.htm). I am NOT anti-Christian, I am anti-”liars-pretending-to-be-Christians.”
Vaughn Gehle
Marshall
This website that he writes about refers to a group of liberal, mainline churches who do not believe that the Bible is the Word of God, especially that the Genesis account is anything more than a morality poem, with characters that never existed. They celebrate Darwins Birthday and try to line up the Origin of Species (false science) with the Bible.
My response to said letter:
To the Editor:
Recently, you published a letter in response to an invitation to celebrate the anniversary of the publication of the Origin of Species. As the organizer of the event on Nov. 17th at 7:00 PM at SMSU, I would like opportunity to retort this letter:
1. Sir, your evidence is as botched as science that says that the complex living organisms we see today sprang from non-life.
2. Ray Comfort did not edit the book, it is printed in its entirety. It is not butchered, unless the original author did so.
3. We are not hitting the road. All scientists are local, and have been invited despite their views, including all science professors at SMSU and at MHS.
4. Your summary of Ken Hovind lacks credibility. The dismissal of scientific work, just because it includes God proves that you are not a true scientist, rather, it is you who are intellectually dishonest.
5. While you are picking your naval lint, people in the community and from SMSU will be having an open forum to discuss both points of view; special creation and evolution. Facts will be presented from both sides, and audience members will have the opportunity to ask questions, and give input. In the end, everybody will make up their own mind. That is what an open forum is all about, which is how it differs from a classroom where only one point of view is accepted.
Ultimately, It is evolutionists who do not want a dissenting point of view, because when true science is used, Evolution is exposed for the fairy tale that it is.
John Chisham
Marshall
Pray for this event, that God is glorified, and that people will consider the truth of the Bible. The Genesis account is crucial to an understanding of our need as humans. Adam, our federal head, broke covenant and sinned against God. As a result, sin entered the world and death through sin. But immediately after the curse, the promise was given in Genesis 3:15- that sin and death would be crushed through the seed of the Woman. This seed- Jesus Christ- was fully man and fully God. His substitutionary death on our behalf gave us the ability to be forgiven of our sins, indeed to be made righteous in Him.

There was one young lady in particular who said she was born again, but she was a lesbian. She did not agree with the teaching of the Bible in that area, to say the least. She was very proud of her otherwise moral lifestyle. She had ( according to her) really done nothing wrong. She had been saved, according to her, but it seemed like just an add on to her life, a label she kept for herself. Other Christians argued that they could live in a variety of other lifestyles of sin, and still be a Christian. We preached the gospel while we responded to questions with answers from the Bible.




























Recent Comments